The Fifth Argumentative Point

For the last issue to argue, we will still talk about writing courses, but this time we will move on to how to assess the ability and performance of the learners. Two ways I'd like you to look at and take your stand are having a conventional writing examination in the exam room and working on a writing assignment at home.

The first way of assessment is the one you're familiar with. It is going to the exam room and write for the whole 30 points or so. The idea is to see how well you can think and write within limited time. The second way is assigning the learners to work at home and turn it in on the due date.

Well, now which stand will you take? Don't forget to discuss one point only and support your stand well. The blog will be closed at 8.00 a.m. on Friday 24th, September, 2010.

Fourth Argumentative Point

This week I would like us to think about the point I am going to put up here. This blog will be closed at 8.00 a.m. on Friday 17th September, 2010.


The idea of 'putting the right person to the right job' always fascinates me in such a way of how we look at the rightness or appropriateness of situations. The particular status quo I would like us to look at is about teaching-learning (English) writing courses. There are two ideas concerning this: we should assign someone with a degree in teaching English to teach the courses or allow a writer to teach writing.

No matter which idea you agree with, remember only one strong or convincing reason is enough.

Third Argumetative Point

There's an issue in our community, Chiang Rai, for us to share our ideas today. It was reported that local residents and environmental activists are rallying to demand a ban on the transport of lignite from a mine in Burma through Chiang Rai (Bangkok Post, published 26 August, 2010).

Up to 5,000 tonnes of lignite mined by Saraburi Coal Co, an affiliate of Italthai Public Co, which holds a lignite mining concession in Burma, would be transported daily through tambon Mae Salong in Mae Fa Luang district and tambon Pa Sang in Mae Chan.

The discussion aired on Thai TV last week demonstrates that villagers and activists are concerned about the project since it will have an impact on their living and environment. One person mentioned that MFU would provide them with studies and information concerning the impact.

However, it is not yet concluded whether or not MFU will have any involvement with this controversial issue. Suppose MFU decided not to get involved saying that as an academic institution, we are not going to take part in anything concerning business.

What would you argue against the decision? Keep in mind that only one interesting/strong point or reason is enough for you to voice your concern.